David Icke And Alex Jones Are Fuckin Bizzaro
01/20/2011
ive noticed a schism in the "freedom" movement- people who rationaly espouse the
pragmatic and moral bonuses inherent in a free society and crazy people who
are into freedom more as paranoid reaction than a well thought out logical conclusion.
there are people who listen to stephan molynieux and penn jillette, and people
who listen to alex jones and david icke.
i know some of these raving nuts myself. they are not "stupid" (not all of them), and i
like these people*, but i think they may, in general, be giving a bad name to us
"anti-government" types. so just so people know, there is a butt load of us who do
not believe in alien infiltration, 9-11 inside job bullshit, the illuminati, NWO, or other
fantastic theories. we just think treating others as we would like to be treated leads
to more comfortable existence for all of us
*id be worried about offending some of these people, but lets face it- aint nobody
reading this shit anyway
New Entry: Post-Whatever Ismism
05/20/2010
POST-PANTHIEST MATERIALISM
okay, it goes like this:
if god could do anything, and be everywhere, doesnt it make sense that he would be
everywhere, that he would be everything? in short, reality is the infinite manifested
in a finite form.
so if god, representing all that is transcendent and spiritual, if he's like, everything, my flesh and blood
and guts and black stuff, then it doesnt make sense to have a soul because
you are already spirituality manifested physically. yer body is yer "spirit" so to have
a soul within that soul, you know, floating around in there or whatever, seems
kinda redundant. and frankly it sounds dumb too.
New Entry: If You Dont Agree With Me Yer A Jerk
03/17/2010
DUDE YER SUCH A DICK
i think problems sould be solved peacefully whenever possible,
and i think its always wrong to use force on peaceful people,
no matter what problem it would solve.
if you think otherwise, if you endorse violence as a means to
an end, then you fit the definition of dick: belligerent asshole
without the intelligence and/or creativity to resolve conflicts
without smacking the shit out of the people who dont agree with
themself. so when i call you a dick, its not just an ad hominem attack
(and it is that as well, i guaran-fuckin-tee it), its an objective literal
definition of the way youve chosen to behave towards yer neighbors.
so if you dont agree with me its because yer a dick
dont be a dick... choose peace
New Entry: Peaceful People Let Peaceful People Behave Peacefully
12/22/2009
THE PRAGMATICS OF MORALITY
i consider myself an anarcist, a capitalist, pro-freedom and pro-peace to a
fault. i get the whole non-aggression principle, the "do unto others" thing,
im fuckin down, and ive even started a website dedicated to propagandizing
these ideals. im a believer.
but i have doubts. insecurities. If free market jesus provides consumers
with want they demand, why have they been provided with government?
when i look back at mans history, it seems inevitable that a coercive social
structure evolves. It seems natural. like part of our genetics. for all the high
minded ideals of us peace n' freedom types, is coercive government in our DNA?
for example, theres a stench of immorality and depravity around sex, yet
we all want to get t'FUCKIN whenever we can. we can ignore our cocks
and our clits and delete all the dirty websites in our histories lest anyone
figure out we enjoy looking at naked people hugging, but we cant delete
the porn in our hearts, ladies and gentlemen.
so if we cant repress sex, can we repress violence? i dont know.
so this is the reason im a true believer, in spite of the doubts:
because i want to be a peaceful person, and peaceful people let peaceful
people behave fucking peacefully, asshole. until i see a flaw in that, then
im a fuckin believer.
New Entry: Six! Sick! Sex! part 2!
12/01/2009
HEAVEY DUTY ON THAT BOOTY
"whats yer definition of dirty, baby?
what do you consider pornography?"
-george michael
when does sensual become obscene? whats the line between love and lust?
where does sexuality lose its aesthetics?
If i were to sum up the the last two entries, it would go like this:
ladies-
im up for it
New Entry: Six! Sick! Sex!
11/12/2009
YOU ARE INTERESTING AND I WANT OT KNOW WHY. PLUS YER TIGHT BANGIN'
sex is beautiful unless it is irresponsible and/or involuntary. "love" can
enhance it, sure (at black collar politics, love is defined as "a hard-on"), but love
can enhance anything (especially as black collar politics defines it).
by irresponsible, i mean being decietful, not protecting yerself and yer partner(s)
ignoring the benefits of lube, sanitizing livestock and so on.
sex is a great way to enjoy the company of others, and i suggest you enoy the
company of others in the way that makes you feel good, as long as yer not
hurting anyone.
so grow up puritanical mutherfuckers. thats really the point i want to
get across here.
youd think a blog like this, advocating, excusing, and promoting promiscuity
must have been written by a real player. unfortunately, i have no game.
just a massive 69 inch american-built pink detonator, so all thoughts
expressed here are really just purely hypothetical. I mean, i can pull in some
quality ass here and there, but, you know... not that often.
